________________________________________________
Second Inning
Thome - soft groundout to Roberts
Dye - Four-pitch walk; Bergesen working outside and was unwilling to give in once he fell behind.
________________________________________________
Konerko - Started out with a fastball outside, good placement; 2-seamer started on the black and ran inside, solid second pitch after FB away; way up an in with his 4-seamer, took off on him a bit; good 2-seamer with late life at the knees (swing and miss); 2-seamer started off on inner-third and ran in (weak foul ball 3B side); 2-seamer middle-down (GB to third, 5-4-3), caught too much of the plate but had enough run/depth to produce the grounder
Inning summary - Bergesen worked quickly and stayed around the zone. He's establishing his fastball and finding a rhythem. As he works through the order a second time, he'll need to mix in more offspeed/breaking stuff as Konerko had him pretty well measured. I think we'll move to a more traditional charting of his pitches next inning and see how that goes. We'll use this summary form: Pitch number, location, result (note, if any).
Third Inning
Pierzynski
P1 - 2S, low-out, strike
P1 - 2S, low-out, strike
P2 - 2S, low, ball (might be CH -- interviewing his dad so delayed coverage of pitch)
P3 - 2S, low, 4-3
Ramirez
P1 - 2S, low-out, 5-3 (still interviewing dad so they aren't showing the full pitch)
Anderson
P1 - 2S, low-out, ball (opened early -- overthrew a bit)
P2 - 2S , low-out, strike (good run, stayed closed in hips; pitch started outside of the zone and came back)
P3 - SL, low-out, ball
P4 - 2S, low, foul (good timing)
P5 - 2S, low-in, strikeout looking
Inning summary - Strong inning from Bergesen. Again, he worked quickly and attacked the zone with his fastball. Since MASN was interviewing his father, I only caught part of the pitch for a few pitches (you can check against gamecast to see what, if anything, I missed). Again, look for him to mix in more offspeed the second time through, but so far he has been impressive. He certainly isn't intimidated, and he's maintaining the same pace and approach that has made him successful in the minors. It's also worth noting that he isn't overthrowing -- he knows his game plan and is sticking to it (props to Zaun in this department; the two are working well).
Fourth Inning
Getz
P1 - 2S, low-out, ball
P2 - 2S, low-out, ball
P3 - 4S, inside, ball
P4 - 2S, low-out, strike (looking)
P5 - 2S, up-out, ball (walk)
Fields
P1 - 2S, low-in, bunt foul
P2 - 2S, low, bunt foul
P3 - SL, low-out, ball
P4 - (good delay in stretch to disrupt batter timing) SL, low-out, ball
P5 - 2S, low-in, swinging strike (terrific placement, good compliment to looking strike in same location previous inning)
Quentin
P1 - (good delay in stretch almost leads to pick-off of Getz) 2S, low, swing and miss (good depth)
P2 - 2S, low, ball
P3 - 2S, middle, foul back (missed his spot but enough movement to prevent Quentin from squaring-up)
P4 - 4S, up, ball
P5 - 2S, inside, E5 (good pitch should have been DP, but Quentin hit it hard)
Thome
P1 - 2S, outside, foul left field (Thome had it measured but good life prevented squaring)
P2 - 2S, low-out, ball
P3 - 4S, up, ball (pretty clearly a strike)
P4 - 2S, out, foul 3B side (should follow with offspeed down-in)
P5 - 2S, in, strikeout looking (set up well by working out and up prior four pitches)
Dye
P1 - CH, low, ball
P2 - 2S, low, foul
P3 - CH, low-out, ball
P4 - 2S, out, single CF
Konerko
P1 - 2S, low, single RF
Inning Summary - As warned against, Bergesen was better timed by the White Sox hitters this time through. He didn't mix in his slider enough in the middle of the order, and Dye/Konerko were ready for his 2-seamer the second time around. We'll see how he bounces back next inning. So far, the outing has to be considered a success, but there aren't any surprises as far as how Bergy's stuff is playing against a veterean ML lineup.
Fifth Inning
Pierzynski
P1 - 2S, low, ball
P2 - 2S, low-in, ball
P3 - 2S, low-in, ball
P4 - 4S, low-out, strike
P5 - 4S, in, foul 3B side
P6 - 4S, out, single RF
Ramirez
P1 - 2S, low, strike (looking)
P2 - SL, low-out, strike (swinging)
P3 - SL, low-out, ball
P4 - SL, low-out, ball
P5 - 4S, in, foul
P6 - 2S, up-in, single LF (missed up in the zone - target in)
Anderson
P1 - 2S, low, 6-4
Getz
P1 - 2S, low-away, strike (looking)
P2 - 2S, inside, strike (looking)
P3 - SL, low, foul 1B
P4 - SL, low-in, hit-by-pitch
Fields
P1 - SL, low, F9
Quentin
P1 - 2S, middle-in, strike (looking)
P2 - SL, low-out, 6-4
Inning Summary - All-in-all, not a bad inning from Bergesen. Chicago is, again, much more patient this time through the order -- as expected, Bergesen's margin for error is minimal. He didn't miss over the plate, and when he fell behind he was around where he wanted to be. Our book on him based on his MiL performances is right on with how he looks tonight. He has a chance to be successful when he's spotting his 2-seamer, but there just isn't any room to miss. His slider is an okay change-of-pace pitch, but the velocity differential isn't really there to throw-off hitters. He did a better job mixing the breaking ball this inning, but he needs to throw it for a strike more often to help his 2-seamer play multiple times through the order.
Sixth Inning
Thome
P1 - 2S, away, foul back
P2 - 2S, low, foul 1B
P3 - SL, out, ball (Zaun set up in -- great call but missed)
P4 - SL, low-in, ball (this was supposed to be the pitch before; executed this time)
P5 - 2S, out, ball
P6 - 4S, out, F8 (Thome didn't miss it by much, ball to warning track)
Dye
P1 - 2S, middle, strike (looking)
P2 - SL, low-middle, foul (back)
P3 - 2S, in, ball
P4 - SL, out, 6-3 (AVG depth on SL but set it up well; without previous pitch, Dye probably gets better wood)
Bergesen pulled.
Inning Summary - Bergesen executed his pitches well against Thome and Dye with the exception of P3 to Thome. His slider isn't a plus pitch, which means he needs to set it up for it to be effective. We see this in the Dye at bat, and likewise we see that Thome wasn't fooled in P4 after seeing the SL on P3.
Overall Impression - Good outing for Bergesen. This offseason, at CamdenDepot.com, we had Bergesen pegged as a leading candidate to be the first called-up and a decent bet to produce back-end quality outings. His first start fits right into that projection. There is lots to be excited about, including a terrific pace, generally good pitch location and a fine execution of a game plan. Things I'd like to see next time around? More sliders for strikes and changeups. It could be that some of his 4-seamers were changeups, but honestly it looked like he pretty much steered clear of that offering for the evening.
One last note, on a couple of occasions, Bergesen delayed in the stretch. One time, this was clearly to try and throw off the batter; the other led Getz to jump in his lead, almost creating a pick-off. Bergesen was poised and in reasonably in command of his arsenal. Baltimore fans should be pleased.
Final line: 5.2 IP, 4 SO, 3 R, 1 ER, 4 H, 2 BB, 95 pitches
________________________________________________
Yeah, I have been mildly impressed with him tonight. If he could develop that slider, he would be a bit more formidable.
ReplyDeleteOne thing I found irritating listening to the radio was how Joe Angel, I think, commented how the Orioles lead the league with 17 unearned runs. He made it sound like it was a defensive issue, which it is to some degree. To a larger degree . . . it is that our pitchers are bad. An unearned run is pretty useless as a stat.
ReplyDeleteI agree w/r/t unearned runs.
ReplyDeleteOverall, I too was "mildly impressed". I think, now more than ever, it's pretty clear what he is and what he isn't. As of right now, innings 3-6 are going to be an issue for him if he doesn't use the slider more effectively.
I think even if he began to command his slider better it would not matter much . . . it just is not a good pitch. I doubt AAA would fix things. Maybe working with Kranitz in side sessions will help. I don't know.
ReplyDeleteWell, from appearance the depth and shape are inconsistent, but he gets enough life on his 2-seamer that the SL could be effective if properly located and set up. He isn't going to get swings-and-misses, but he can get bad contact. I think this sort of start is a "win" for Bergy. I'd take it each time he takes the mound (even if it means he's as likely to allow 4 ER as 1).
ReplyDeleteWell . . . it means that his 4 and 2 have to be working well all of the time. If he has even the slightest of issues . . . he really has nothing to fall back on.
ReplyDeleteIf he can keep up a 10-2 GB/FB ratio, then I think he can continue having some success. I was pessimistic going in, so I came out more impressed. And he looked better than Adam Eaton.
ReplyDeleteI will buy you a pony and ice cream cake if he keeps a 10-2 ratio.
ReplyDelete:)
Obviously, he won't keep that ratio up...but he has averaged GB rates in the mid-50's over the past three seasons in the minors. A guy can survive at Camden Yards if he can keep the ball on the ground.
ReplyDeleteHe works "away" well...I wonder what happens when the league adjusts to that a bit.
I don't know how much faith to put in the existence of "game calling ability," but Zaun seems to be relatively good at it and may help in that regard.
ReplyDeleteGiven that he did hit 94, the occasional inside four-seamer might be useful.
And I'll gladly take even 0.5% of a free pony and ice cream cake, though I'm a little curious as to how yo came up with that combination.